Essay on The Variations in Little Red Riding Hood

The Variations in Little Red Riding Hood Fairy tales are under attack in the United States from both right- and left-oriented pressure groups. (Ravitch, 62-96) From the left, the charges include sexism, stereotyping, distortion, and anti-humanism. (Ravitch, 84) From the right, the charges include immorality and objections to the portrayal of violence, death, and the supernatural. In addition, some critics claim that the tales terrify their children. (Ravitch, 76). In The Language Police, Diane Ravitch claims that both groups understand the importance of putting pressure on state textbook adoption committees, and that, as a result of such pressure, most major publishers are simply dropping the tales from the textbooks they sell to†¦show more content†¦Perrault did, however, append a short poem with a moral in it. The moral warns young women to beware the treacheries of men. The sources of Perraults version are a matter of dispute, but his intended audience is not in dispute. His tales were aimed at genteel French society, not children. It is ironic therefore, that Perraults tales, and especially Little Red, are now considered fairy tales for children. Perraults tale has been published both with and without the moralistic poem, but both versions are often considered inappropriate for children. Some people claim that the sudden ending -- with the eating of Red -- terrifies children. Others, of course, point to the inappropriateness of the poems lesson in virginity for four and five-year-olds. In the Grimms version, both Red and her grandmother are eaten by the wolf, but miraculously saved by a huntsman who, instead of shooting the wolf, cuts open its belly, apparently while the wolf is still alive, in order to release first Little Red, and then her grandmother. Red then fills the wolfs belly with stones, and as a result, justice is served and the wolf dies. The moral of the Grimms version also differs from that of Perrault. The Grimms emphasize obedience. Before she sets out, Red is given strict and fairly detailed instructions by her mother, not to stray from the path. The wolf tempts her from the path, she sins, and thus her being eaten by the wolf is often considered by critics as the punishment for herShow MoreRelatedShort Story : Little Red Riding Hood1364 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"Little Red Riding Hood† is an extremely well known fairy tale that has been told across the globe in a multitude of versions. The story is often told with a young girl dressed in a hooded red coat, sent by her mother to deliver a basket of food to her sick grandmother. On the journey to her grandmother’s house, Little Red Riding Hood meets a wolf, whom she assumes to be good-natured. She tells him where she is headed and who she is planning on visiting. Although the little girl trusts the wolf,Read MoreLittle Red Riding Hood By Sam The Sham And The Pharaohs1244 Words   |  5 Pagesstory of Little Red Riding Hood also changes. Over the years innumerable variations have been created. Used by many, the story of Little Red Riding Hood has debuted in print, games, tv, painting, and song. Some adaptations fit into the category of a fairy tale while others branch out into other genres. The song â€Å"Lil’ Red Riding Hood† by Sam the Sham the Pharaohs exemplifies the story of Little Red Riding Hood. Although the song and story possess distinct differences, â€Å"Lil’ Red Riding Hood† is a fairyRead More Is Charles Perraultâ€⠄¢s Little Red Riding Hood Relevant to the Modern World?1470 Words   |  6 PagesIs Charles Perrault’s Little Red Riding Hood Relevant to the Modern World? A story commonly spread through word of mouth, Charles Perrault wrote an early rendition of Little Red Riding Hood in 1697. Between the late 17th century and today, there have been a few changes in societal norms, customs, and understandings of social values. To summarize, laws based on religion have given way to laws based on science†¦in turn, scientists have taken their newfound social power and discovered waysRead MoreFairy Tales Paper: A Retelling of Little Red Riding Hood941 Words   |  4 Pagesthat generally include a moral or pervading theme that is meant to aid the listener. One characteristic of oral stories are the variations that often occurred with each retelling as a result of errors in translation and interpretations, as well as changes driven by the storyteller’s desire to share a particular point of view with the listener. A modern twist on these variations is evident in children’s literature today. â€Å"The Sisters Grimm†, a popul ar series written by best-selling author Michael BuckleyRead MoreHow Traditional Literature Has Changed Over Time894 Words   |  4 Pagesreally been passed down over time. The stories we hear depends on many things, like if they have been changed over time or what culture the stories come from. Traditional literature is never usually told the same way two times, usually there is some variation within the stories. (Temple, Martinez, Yokota, 2015, p. 184). Traditional literature is not always flexible in its characteristics, and because of this â€Å"there is an increasing need for diverse perspective’s† (Alexander, Sanez, 2006, p. 22). TheRead MoreZipess View on Fairytales1975 Words   |  8 PagesIn this essay, I examine what Zipes means by institutionalised, define what makes a fairy tale and evaluate how different versions of Little Red Riding Hood reflect the social ideology of the period. Zipes is not using ‘institutionalised’ in the traditional, negative sense of being rigid and never evolving. He theorises that fairy tales have become part of the social psyche. They permeate into every aspect of the social unconscious to become meme, examples of which are ‘tunes, ideas and catchphrases’Read MoreGender Stereotypes in Little Red Cap and The Grandmother1052 Words   |  5 Pages The folk tale of â€Å"Little Red Riding Hood† has numerous variations and interpretations depending on what recorded version is being read or analyzed. â€Å"Little Red Cap,† by the Grimm Brothers, and â€Å"The Grandmother,† as collected by Achille Millien, are different in numerous ways: the depth of the narrative structure, characters involved, length – yet, the moral lesson is largely unchanged between the two versions. One of the more glaring differences between the two versions is the way that the narratorRead MoreFairytale Analysis: Aladdins Lamp and Little Red Riding Hood1133 Words   |  5 Pagesintentional. This shifting nature predicates the textual integrity of the tale, allowing it a pertinent and germane makeup, built upon its didactic nature. This significance is especially apparent in the appropriations of ‘Aladdin’s Lamp’ and ‘Little Red Riding Hood’. Aladdin’s Lamp, 1704, was included in Antoine Galland’s translation of Arabian Nights., however, it has a status as a disputed orphan tale, bearing its origins vaguely from an 1115 manuscript and a tale recited to Galland by a scholarRead MoreAnalysis Of Borgata Hotel Casino And Spa864 Words   |  4 PagesUpon a quick glance, the advertisement published in 2015 by Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa appears to be abundant in color, joyful and fairytale-like; at least when I first saw it a year ago. However, after reading about the different variations of objectification in advertisements I no longer see the ad as an innocent take on fairytales. Advertisements are meant to be geared to a public, or a specific public, in order to sell a product. Still, some ads showcase women as the product or at least a wayRead MoreFairytales are not what they seem. Essay1243 Words   |  5 Pagesof tales. How many of us can recount a version separate from the animated classics of our childh ood? It is truly hard to believe that sometimes there are much more racy versions of these same tales. Today, I ‘d like to share one such variation of Little Red Riding Hood called In the Company of Wolves, written by Angela Carter. I will recount ancient folklore of werewolves, introduce the sexually charged characters as I walk with you through the seemingly familiar yet much more raw path to grandmother’s

How Did Shakespeare Portray the Concept Free Essays

How did Shakespeare portray a concept of honour in Henry IV part 1? In this world, there exists, since the dawn of civilisation of mankind, a thing that we are fighting and dying for—that is honour. Shakespeare explores the theme of honour in Henry IV part 1 in a rather interesting way by having it presented in a different form varying from character to character. Henry IV wants to protect his honour by using any means available to vanquish the rebels, his sinful act to King Richard also keeps haunting him and shakes his own faith in his honour. We will write a custom essay sample on How Did Shakespeare Portray the Concept or any similar topic only for you Order Now While his son’s dishonourable acts in the beginning of the play wearies him further. Superficially, one may think Prince Hal is a typical young slacker whose life has been fully lured by the glamorous but immoral world of liquor,gambling, prostitution and crime, the truth is, unbeknownst to anyone, the prince is scheming to reform himself from an idler into a more responsible and competent heir to the throne. Here, his vision of honour of behaving like the royal is an impetus for him to seek new behaviour which will bring him more merits, making him an honourable figure the status he deserves. Or Hotspur, honour is everything, ironically more valuable than his wife. His excess obsession of honour induces many political mistakes, most notably his decision to confront the king at Shreswbury despite having less number of troops. In other words, Hotspur’s passion for honour blinds him from the reality. For all his chivalry and valor in the battle, Hotspur is proved to fail at being a military strategis as well as effective leader. It is none other than the lazy, unscrupulous and coward Sir Falstaff whose existence in the play represents the values that totally oppose the fore-mentioned concepts of honour. His disenchanted view on honour can make the audiences see that the reason behind other characters’ action are single-minded and irrational or more poignantly worthless. Overall, the exhilaration of the play partially arises from Shakespeare’ way of presenting honour in various forms, paralleling the play to the real world where different people all know honour with different interpretation. King Henry IV whose name is the title of the play, is not in fact the protagonist, however the play speculates what has occurred during his turbulent reign. In Richard II, the audiences see him as dynamic and brave, indicating his kingly qualities. All the audiences must then be bewildered upon seeing him in this play. Suspicious, stressful and sick was the king after all dishonouralbe acts he did to King Richard previously. Shakespeare tries to explore how the sin of being viciously dishonourable comes back to haunt its perpetrator. Despite the king’s regret of what he did to Richard and his passion to redeem himself by going to crusade, this sin seems to block all the means for the king to purify himself. The rebellion of the Percys and rebellious nature of his son led him to grow very ill. Act one scene one, he moaned about his son and mistakenly praises Hotspur’s qualities, saying that Hotspur is â€Å"a son (of Percy) who is the theme of honour’s tongue, implying that Hal brings him with nothing but shame and disgrace. His anger even drives him further to contemplate that if he only and Northumberland could switch sons, â€Å"would have I (himself) his Harry and he mine. Fortuantely, in the end the king gains back honour by defeating the rebels and his son, who used to represent everything he scorns and acts dishonourably, has redeemed himself and proves to be an effective warrior. Henry Momouth or affectionately known as Hal is an interesting character as well as complex. At the beginning,the audiences see Hal as a drunken idler who acts nothing like an heir to the throne. Unexpectedly, Hal, in Act 1scne 2 makes it clear that he doesn’t plan to live the rest of his life in this world of immorality, in fact he claims that he is pretending to be this sort of person then when the right moment comes, he is going to transform himself into a person with all characteristics of the king. Reformation, glittering over faults, will do more goodly and attract more eyes† expresses his prediction that his â€Å"reformation† would make his subjects surprises and therefore gains more popularity for him which is necessary in order to keep the kingdom stable. Hal has a vision that the great honour of being king will at the eventually fall on him whether he likes it or not. This vision of future honour is the impetus of Hal’s self-reformation. Henry Ho tspur was a renowned warrior whose actions and decisions all have been influenced by the concept of honour. Unlike other characters, Hotspur’ was too obsessed with honour, resulting in a single-minded decision making. For all his chivalry, Hotspur was an utter political failure. Act 4 Scene 1, despite possessing less troops, HOTSPUR, without opening his mind for Worcester and Vernon’s suggrstion, decided to confront the king’s troops the next day. Moreove, this sort of obsession makes Hotspur far from being diplomatic. Whenever he is angry, he always bursts and doesn’t listen to anyone but himself. All this proves that, comparing to Hal, he is not deserved to wield the power. However, despite these differences, he and Hal share only one common belief in one respect of honor. Both of them make it clear that in order for one to gain honor, another one must die first. â€Å"Harry to Harry shall, hot horse to horse, meet and never drop til one dropped a corpse† said Hotspur in Act 4 scene 1 before the battle of shrewsbury. This line best exemplified the fore-mentioned point. Falstaff lacked any sort of honur. â€Å"what is honur? A word†, expressed Flastaff, demonstrating his disenchanted attitude towards honour. Although having been opposing this concept, at the end of act 5 scene 4, Falstaff seems to be sel-contradictory when he commented that he would embrace a new and more honourable lifestyle only if he gains honor and status after the battle. From this, it is clear that Falstaff would embrace the concept of honour only if honor comes to him first. Therefore he does not oppose honour for ideological reason but rather for practical reason as through out the play honour in anyform doesn’t seem to come to him‘ In conclusion, different characters in this play have different concepts of honour How to cite How Did Shakespeare Portray the Concept, Essay examples

Locke And Rousseau (1492 words) Essay Example For Students

Locke And Rousseau (1492 words) Essay Locke And RousseauThe idea of consent is a key element in the works of John Locke and Jean-JacquesRousseau. In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke puts forth hisconception of the ideal form of government based on a social contract. As Lockedevelops his theory of consent, he also incorporates theories of politicalobligation on the part of all citizens of his state as well as his theory ofrevolution and the conditions under which rebellion is permissible. Though Lockemay appear to have explored the notion of consent completely, there are someproblems with his theory that weaken its impact. Despite the possible problemsencountered with Lockes idea of consent in a political society, Rousseau, inhis essay On the Social Contract, seems to agree with Locke with regardsto the concept of consent as it applies to the use of money. The works of Lockeand Rousseau explore political foundations that depend on a social contractwhich requires consent above all things in order to secure liberty for thepeople. John Locke powerfully details the benefits of consent as a principleelement of government, guaranteed by a social contract. Locke believes in theestablishment of a social compact among people of a society that is unique inits ability to eliminate the state of nature. Locke feels the contract must endthe state of nature agreeably because in the state of nature every one hasexecutive power of the law of nature(742). This is a problem because men arethen partial to their own cases and those of their friends and may becomevindictive in punishments of enemies. Therefore, Locke maintains that agovernment must be established with the consent of all that will restrain thepartiality and violence of men(744). People must agree to remove themselvesfrom the punishing and judging processes and create impartiality in a governmentso that the true equality of men can be preserved. Without this unanimousconsent to government as holder of executive power, men who attempt to establishab solute power will throw society into a state of war(745). The importance offreedom and security to man is the reason he gives consent to the government. Hethen protects himself from any one partial body from getting power over him. Hecan appeal to a higher authority in his community once the consent of the peoplesets up a judiciary(746). As Locke develops his theory of consent, he addressesthe issue of liberty and states that in giving consent, men do give up theirnatural liberty, which involves being free from the will of any man andliving by the law of nature. However, in the social contract we exchange thisnatural liberty for freedom of men under government, in which we have anatural, standing rule to live by, common to everyone, made by thelegislative(747). With consent to government, men still have the liberty tofollow their own will in matters where the law does not dictate otherwise. Therefore, men do not have to suffer enslavement to political institutions. ForLocke, this justifies consent to government and ordered society. Lockeincorporates his views on money into his consent theory, for he feels that menhave agreed tacitly, with the invention of money, to put a value on property andestablish rights to it(751). The consent of men to place a value on money hasallowed men to support themselves with property and labor and alsoincrease the common stock of mankind(751). Consent makes industry andthe accumulation of the wealth of society possible and Locke considers this apositive achievement. Involved deeply in the theory of consent is Lockesinterpretation of political obligation. Locke views government as essential tothe evolution of a civil society in which the inconveniences of the state ofnature are rejected while the safety and security men desire are protected bygovernment. Therefore, the people, as part of the social contract, have a dutyto obey the laws inst ituted by government and to accept the concept of majorityrule as fundamental to the continued equality of the society. In consenting topolitical authority, men agree to allow the body with the greater force toinfluence policy(769). Men must have confidence in the proper functioning ofgovernment because they rely on the social compact. Their obligation is to abideby the terms of the compact so that both people and government enjoy smoothsailing. Locke also explores the idea of revolution and insists that the peoplewho have created government with unanimous consent in order to preserve theirproperty and safety should not be betrayed by the very institutions they gavebirth to. So Locke states that if any of the three powers in government make amove to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce themto slavery under arbitrary power then the people are no longer expected toobey the political authority(807). If the government is guilty of a breach oftrust they forfeit the power(807). Locke believes that giving the people theoption to rebel does not provoke frequent uprising against government. On thecontrary, this option being open is a protective measure and keeps things inorder, for the people will realize there is a way out if the government ceasesto represent their interests. It is, in a sense, a safety valve for the peopleand gives them the reassurance of having some control over governmentsactions. Lockes theory of consent encounters some minor problems. One of thepossible problems regards the propertyless person. For a man who has nopossessions, the desire for protection of property that motivates men to consentto government is nonexistent. He has no reason to want government and so will bebeyond the reach of political authority. Such a person, Locke maintains, issubject to despotical power(794). Also, Locke feels that anyone who enjoys theprivileges of government, like driving on the roads, gives tacit consent togovernment(777). However, many people are not conscious of the fact that drivingon the roads is giving consent to government. The education of exactly what isand what is not consent to government is an issue Locke does not address. Histheory of consent is weakened by the fact that many may not be as aware of theirconsent to government as he believes. With regards to revolution, it can be saidthat Locke views rebellion as a way to reinstate political rights violated by anunjust sovereign. He states that once the government has breached the trust ofthe citizenry, the people have a right to resume their original liberty, and,by the establishment of a new legislativeprovide for their own safety andsecurity(807). The peoples duty is to subvert the authority that is nolonger functioning in a just manner, a manner appropriate to its creation, andto assert their rights as stipulated by the social contract by forming a newgovernment. It is simply a starting over for the society, but no power hasreally changed hands, except on a very temporary basis. The people take powerlong enough to build a new legislative and then relinquish power to the newgovernment. Revolution ensures that malfunctioning government does not dissolvethe political rights of a society. Jean-Jacques Rousseau develops his politicaltheory in response to the contention of Locke that his idea of government is theideal. Rousseau believes in a much higher level of political participation andobligation, but for the most part concurs with Locke regarding the role ofconsent in establishing government. Rousseau would definitely agree with Lockethat men give their mutual consent to money as a store of value in a society. .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db , .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .postImageUrl , .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db , .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:hover , .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:visited , .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:active { border:0!important; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:active , .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u5cc07f0827634069a49ecceff15822db:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Bahamas After Independence Sample EssayRousseau feels that the social compact, as it secures the consent of all, willbenefit every man equally and protect his property. The general will of thepeople can direct the forces of the state to ensure the common goodis served(919). As money is the element that allows men to acquire wealth andprovide for their families, money would certainly be welcomed by the people,with their consent to its value, as serving the common good. Rousseau wouldcontend that if money existed as a store of value, it could be so only with thefull consent of the people. The general will only acts to serve its own needs ina positive way(920). Therefore, money would be accepted as benefiting society,as Locke maintains. The works of Locke and Rousseau expand the idea of consentas the pathway to government that serves the people at all times and can berecalled and challenged by the populace if it fails to obey the terms of thesocial contract. Even if Lockes ideas are only a compilation of ideasswimming around in the philosophical pool in his time, his confidence in theirability to establish a secure, positive political and civil society influencedour founding fathers as they worked to design government. His theory of consentand Rousseaus expansion on it in his works emphasize how essential it is forboth people and government to be held by certain standards so that everyone issatisfied. In reading Locke and Rousseau, a reader is compelled to compare thetheories of these philosophers with the political reality today. Though theirperception of the ideal government differs, the impact of their work combinedcan be clearly realized. BibliographyLocke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Rousseau,Jean-Jacques. On the Social Contract.